From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 7 23:13:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F72316A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 23:13:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (A17-250-248-89.apple.com [17.250.248.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E968E43D5F for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 23:13:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin08-en2 [10.13.10.153]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id i36Ipg52006621; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 11:51:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.1.193] (nfw2.codefab.com [199.103.21.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)i36IpdBP000231; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 11:51:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4072F398.5040709@kientzle.com> References: <200404052132.i35LWIgJ009519@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040406082945.GD397@ip.net.ua> <4072F398.5040709@kientzle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <6CD0CF04-87FB-11D8-B6C6-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 14:51:33 -0400 To: Tim Kientzle X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613) cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/tar Makefile bsdtar.1 bsdtar.c bsdtar.h bsdtar_platform.h matching.c read.c util.c write.c X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 06:13:23 -0000 On Apr 6, 2004, at 2:14 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote: > There are still a few bugs to iron out and a couple of features that > are a bit incomplete, but it's getting better quickly. My hope > is that a few adventurous souls will start using it and giving > me feedback so that I can grow it into the system tar > that FreeBSD deserves. Most excellent, Tim. Any chance of bsdtar being made available for -STABLE systems, or as a port? [ I keep one 5.x system around for testing the ports I maintain, so I still could do some testing if not, but I'd be able to use it in many more places if it was MFC'ed or made available via ports.... ] -- -Chuck