Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 13:52:05 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Message-ID: <20000315135205.C60742@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20000315105155.A9533@dan.emsphone.com>; from dnelson@emsphone.com on Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 10:51:55AM -0600 References: <38CF48CF.59A100D7@altavista.net> <20000315105155.A9533@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 10:51:55AM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: > I get it with -O2 (-Os implies -O2, so it's probably the same problem). Not quite. -0s ==> all the -O2 optimizations that do not increase code size. -Os can also perform other optimizations not part of -O2 that decrease code size. The -Os ==> -O2 only tells you how "risky" in optimizing -Os is willing to be. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000315135205.C60742>