Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 Aug 2004 10:08:43 +0200
From:      Jorn Argelo <jorn@wcborstel.nl>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 5.2.1 kernel w/ SMP under high load = panic
Message-ID:  <200408031009.20022.jorn@wcborstel.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20040802190220.B40403@kira.epconline.net>
References:  <50335.81.84.175.12.1091365736.squirrel@81.84.175.12> <200408021532.52817.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20040802190220.B40403@kira.epconline.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 03 August 2004 02:07, Chuck Rock wrote:
> I had a similar problem with this release running on any Dell 2550 Rack
> server I had. I tried three different servers with the same config, and I
> had kernel panics at various times. All of them had different information
> on the screen at each panic.
>
> I had several people tel lme they had no such problems with the same
> systems.
>
> I chalked it up to bad driver for the PERC3/DC raid controller. All panics
> seemd to happen under very high disk I/O. The machine would run fine for a
> few days, then just puke.
>
> I moved all the stuff over to a refurb Compaq Dual Xeon 2.8, and have had
> only one problem lockup in the 5 months I've been running it under
> increasing loads. The last lockup I had also seemed related to disk I/O.
>
> Otherwise, 5.2.1 has been a very stable production server processing over
> 1 million E-mail's a day incoming and hundred thousand out.
>
> Chuck
>

During my traineeship we had an PowerEdge 2650 (Dual Xeon with FreeBSD 5.1 =
at=20
that time). The machine had quite high loads (8.00 - 11.00, which was 24/7)=
,=20
but it kept working most times. Sometimes after a few days or weeks it=20
resulted in a panic. My mentor (who was the Unix specialist) said that it w=
as=20
probably been caused by the RAID controller as well. It was a PERC2/DC or=20
PERC3/DC, not really sure. I think it's the latter. Anyway, when 5.2 came=20
out, my mentor immediately upgraded to 5.2, and the machine became rock=20
solid, even with very high loads. It was a monitoring machine, which=20
collected over 1600 SMNP requests from every server, so I'm not really sure=
=20
if that produces an high disk I/O or not.=20

Perhaps the story is not interesting, but I felt like sharing that.

Cheers,

Jorn


=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBD0gQs2lBCry7iusRAozeAJ9ID3yBuNSui9EU7tuLJaPZcOc67wCfT7UQ
LB+IWXbsYiQQZNs/2CJYz64=3D
=3Dr1AQ
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200408031009.20022.jorn>