From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 14:30:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F05C106566C; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:30:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@freebsd.org) Received: from swip.net (mailfe03.c2i.net [212.247.154.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289288FC0A; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:30:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=yVKV3zusvCapyMfYJBNW2j35FMEuTKq6vh/tt/1L5+g= c=1 sm=1 a=SvYTsOw2Z4kA:10 a=Bjjt3Ia5OwMA:10 a=dBRESv0yCI8A:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=CL8lFSKtTFcA:10 a=i9M/sDlu2rpZ9XS819oYzg==:17 a=5fQSd4wB9WT8dlvhfs8A:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=i9M/sDlu2rpZ9XS819oYzg==:117 Received: from [188.126.198.129] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe03.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.19) with ESMTPA id 4585598; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:30:16 +0200 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=mailfe03.swip.net; client-ip=188.126.198.129; envelope-from=hselasky@freebsd.org From: Hans Petter Selasky To: Andriy Gapon Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:27:42 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201107132107.p6DL7ojq099900@svn.freebsd.org> <4E5B9334.5020502@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E5B9334.5020502@FreeBSD.org> X-Face: *nPdTl_}RuAI6^PVpA02T?$%Xa^>@hE0uyUIoiha$pC:9TVgl.Oq, NwSZ4V"|LR.+tj}g5 %V,x^qOs~mnU3]Gn; cQLv&.N>TrxmSFf+p6(30a/{)KUU!s}w\IhQBj}[g}bj0I3^glmC( :AuzV9:.hESm-x4h240C`9=w MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201108291627.42477.hselasky@freebsd.org> Cc: "svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org" , "svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org" , "src-committers@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: svn commit: r223989 - head/sys/dev/usb/input X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:30:19 -0000 On Monday 29 August 2011 15:25:08 Andriy Gapon wrote: > Another question - why ukbd_yield() is needed? > Why kern_yield() would not be good here? > What are the priority manipulations in ukbd_yield? > Not saying that the code is incorrect, just that this is not explained in > the commit message. This is needed during mountroot prompt, to allow the worker threads of the USB code to run, because the mountroot code is like: while (1) { cngetc(); } instead of: while (1) { cngetc(); pause("WAIT_A_BIT", 1); } --HPS