Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 17:14:13 -0400 From: Christopher Weimann <cweimann@k12hq.com> To: Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> Cc: tlambert2@mindspring.com, audit@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG, fenner@research.att.com, knu@iDaemons.org Subject: Re: moused(8): char signed-ness problem with gcc 3.1 Message-ID: <20020516171413.B61691@mail.k12us.com> In-Reply-To: <200205161047.g4GAldU47929@lakes.dignus.com>; from rivers@dignus.com on Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:47:39AM -0400 References: <3CE33321.B2FBD340@mindspring.com> <200205161047.g4GAldU47929@lakes.dignus.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:47:39AM -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote: > > Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> wrote: > > RS/6000's didn't used to use PPC processors at all; so it's > > probably intentional software compatability. > > I'm confused then - the one we have here seems to. There > was a version of something very RS/6000-like that didn't, > but I thought RS/6000s did... > RS/6000s used to use Power before there was PowerPC. I'm doubting there is much difference between the two from a software point of view. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020516171413.B61691>