Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Dec 1996 20:59:00 -0700 (MST)
From:      Wes Peters <softweyr@xmission.com>
To:        jgrosch@sirius.com
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD beats SCO at its own game
Message-ID:  <199612230359.UAA00416@obie.softweyr.com>
In-Reply-To: <199612201727.JAA01926@superior.truenorth.org>
References:  <199612201647.IAA04872@athena.tera.com> <199612201727.JAA01926@superior.truenorth.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Josef Grosch writes:
 > I have spent a lot of time contracting in big COBOL/IBM shops in Chicago
 > and I have not heard of one. Their maybe several out there but considering
 > what a unholy mess the average legacy program is I doubt they are any good.
 > Keep in mind COBOL is almost as old as FROTRAN (1957 - 1958) and each
 > manufacture had their own spin on COBOL, adding little "features" and miss
 > implemting other languages components. Write a __GOOD__ translator and the
 > world will beat a path to your door.

I can see it now... GNU Cobol!  With object-oriented Cobol 95 extensions!
FreeBSD would, of course, be the ultimate platform to replace those aging
mainframes.  ;^)

-- 
          "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

Wes Peters                                                       Softweyr LLC
http://www.xmission.com/~softweyr                       softweyr@xmission.com






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612230359.UAA00416>