From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 13 14: 1:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-32.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786EC37B424 for ; Sun, 13 May 2001 14:01:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2614267AFE; Sun, 13 May 2001 14:01:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 14:01:28 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Peter Pentchev Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: ports/26544: New AuctTeX version]] Message-ID: <20010513140127.A63022@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010508100849.B59070@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010508100849.B59070@ringworld.oblivion.bg>; from roam@orbitel.bg on Tue, May 08, 2001 at 10:08:49AM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 10:08:49AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Eep; this has been in my mailbox for quite a while now :( > So.. what does the general public think about it? Should the AUC Tex > port be upgraded, breaking compatibility with Emacs 19? Yeah. If anyone complains (or if you feel like doing it anyway), we could make an auctex9 port. Kris --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6/vYnWry0BWjoQKURAtQxAJsHXTFA3EwywGnsx2d7u7Q+zhUKbgCfR8+1 Dop58zNR2PFmN6whz4/Zhp4= =h0Vs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message