Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:00:33 +0100 From: Accounts Department<bzhang@issas.ac.cn> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Your Email Account Breaches| DO NOT IGNORE (Secure Privacy) Message-ID: <20161226125842.5B8F6FEAD5@mail.mare.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Some Mails Are Not Reaching Your Mailbox, RESOLVE NOW. = = Dear ports@FreeBSD.org; = Due to the recent mail account security breaches that affected most email= account providers, we noticed your mailbox was among the affected. = We remain vigilant in protecting our personal information so as part of ou= r effort to improve your experience with our service, we updated our SSL encryption Standard and advised all users/staffs to val= idate their email account by following the below VERIFIED ACCESS POINT to a= void email theft/losing of your email account. = = VERIFIED ACCESS POINT to secure account and privacy automatically. = Failure to comply automatically puts your account in danger and off our ma= iling lists. This notification was sent by Mail Account Administration =96 All Rights Reserved! =20 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 26 14:02:43 2016 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E43C914D4 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:02:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (mailhost.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:418:3fd::f7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "m5p.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B8C51B3C for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:02:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from [IPv6:2001:418:3fd::1f] (haymarket.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:418:3fd::1f]) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id uBQE2ZTr014971 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 09:02:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Subject: Re: The ports collection has some serious issues To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <e2fb7eec-b894-a1e4-eb6d-2e1c5b500a44@marino.st> <20161218013548.GA25190@server.rulingia.com> <3c83b1e8-4428-ddcf-9b55-3793e098c6af@marino.st> <20161219064829.GA31821@server.rulingia.com> <1a7d2787-22a4-97bd-c3ca-86f45aab45ec@marino.st> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1612202354110.43538@aneurin.horsfall.org> <20161220175134.k6746kqod4v7osey@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <71.36.31287.FB0D0685@dnvrco-omsmta01> From: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> Message-ID: <cef65106-ee54-f0f2-3225-7b986c00a9b2@m5p.com> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 09:02:35 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <71.36.31287.FB0D0685@dnvrco-omsmta01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mattapan.m5p.com X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.1 (mailhost.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:418:3fd::f7]); Mon, 26 Dec 2016 09:02:41 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:02:43 -0000 On 12/26/16 03:11, Thomas Mueller wrote: > [...] > What is the current status of portupgrade and portmaster? > > Maintained, deprecated or something else? > > Tom > [...] If "contentious" were an official state, that would be it. Each has its enthusiastic adherents; others are, shall we say, less enthusiastic. -- George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161226125842.5B8F6FEAD5>