From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 22 19:16:42 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D34C916A4E4; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:16:42 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 609CB43D54; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:16:42 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3MJFY60043352;
	Fri, 22 Apr 2005 13:15:35 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 13:15:34 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20050422.131534.59696216.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050422182727.GA2753@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References: <20050422174209.GA97721@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<42693837.7090400@samsco.org>
	<20050422182727.GA2753@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: peter@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libpthread version bump
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:16:43 -0000

> Having lived through the std{io,err,out} libc snafu, the
> libm.so.2 snafu, and now the libc.so.5/libpthread.so.1
> problem, I will once again suggest that *ALL* library
> version numbers should be bumped when a new branch is
> created.

Yes.  When a library version is bumped, *ALL* libraries that depend on
it need to be bumped.  Sadly, this has proven to be too difficult
because it would create an unholy maintanence problem for the ports.

Warner