From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug 24 11:39:10 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF159DE3;
 Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:39:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48DD233D4;
 Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:39:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHH6Z-1X8dyJ2sIF-00E5VP; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 13:39:00
 +0200
Message-ID: <53F9CEDA.4070309@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 13:39:06 +0200
From: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Berkeley DB 4...4.7 port removals/upgrades may require
 manual preparation
References: <53F640EF.7000200@FreeBSD.org>
 <20140824102826.GB9400@home.opsec.eu>
 <EB2B24ED-1D62-467B-8870-EEACA8A72281@freebsd.org>
 <20140824111149.GD9400@home.opsec.eu>
In-Reply-To: <20140824111149.GD9400@home.opsec.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:iUNmsrDHslUKIoVslDEF7IsgehpzhMgCcovDOkZG+BxUtSnDm1C
 5nDfzc1rUt5ZzqJD30zbK/0IIMmcmRdGHpFsJNZ3GLRc1IXuegpdvp3rLxvQ86ygztmjfUA
 d+wtNo0BX/JE9n2llcz8gh5elmLN+XeXnfiYB8Fj0FO/cidFXJImIJCDeruej16O/Osw2FD
 Fi6VRI6DbXTvfq/JpdOgg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Cc: ports-list freebsd <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:39:10 -0000

On 2014-08-24 13:11, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
> 
>>> For devel/ice:
> [...]
>> Is this exclusive to portupgrade (does "make install" work)? Ice
>> only supports bdb 5, so the Makefile should be correct.
> 
> No, it's not exclusive. Same behaviour with
> 
> # make
> ===>  Ice-3.5.1_1 cannot install: no eligible BerkeleyDB version. Requested: 6, incompatible: 40 41 42 43 44 46 47 48 6. Try: make debug-bdb.
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop.
> make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/ice
> 


Hm, using USE_BDB=$numble looks wrong to me in devel/ice.

Can you test the following patch.

Index: Makefile
===================================================================
--- devel/ice/Makefile    (revision 365910)
+++ devel/ice/Makefile    (working copy)
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@
 .endif

 USES=                  iconv gmake
-USE_BDB=               5
+USE_BDB=               yes
+WANT_BDB_VER=          5
 INVALID_BDB_VER=       40 41 42 43 44 46 47 48 6
 USE_LDCONFIG=          yes
 BUILD_WRKSRC?=         ${WRKSRC}/cpp


-- 
olli