Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:34:42 +0300
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: archaic/useless CFLAGS options for x86 boot blocks
Message-ID:  <4E6DFC62.9080405@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <201109120826.36804.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <4E6DB696.1080608@FreeBSD.org> <201109120743.02181.jhb@freebsd.org> <4E6DF4D6.8050501@FreeBSD.org> <201109120826.36804.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 12/09/2011 15:26 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Monday, September 12, 2011 8:02:30 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> I think the patch is
>>> fine, and I'd even prefer to go ahead and drop the extra cruft (like removing
>>> nops and aligns as well as -mrtd and -mregparm) from the UFS boot2 as well.
>>
>> I personally agree, thank you for this suggestion.
>> My current plan is to leave boot2 alone until stable/9 is branched, but to try to
>> get zfs/gpt boot changes into 9.0.  What do you think?
> 
> I think this is fine.
> 

Another thing that was suggested to me via private communication is to change -Os
to -O1 for those "non-constrained" boot blocks.  I do not see anything wrong with
that.

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E6DFC62.9080405>