From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jun 16 13:57:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA7737B406; Sun, 16 Jun 2002 13:57:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 295E1AE147; Sun, 16 Jun 2002 13:57:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 13:57:19 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Matthew Dillon Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, jdp@polstra.com, obrien@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rtld-elf patches for non-i386 architectures (review / test request) Message-ID: <20020616205719.GC67925@elvis.mu.org> References: <200206162042.g5GKg5JW041655@apollo.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200206162042.g5GKg5JW041655@apollo.backplane.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Matthew Dillon [020616 13:43] wrote: > These are the rtld-elf patches for -current for non-i386 architectures. > Since I can't test these I would appreciate it if people could > review them, and test if possible on alpha, ia64, sparc64, and alpha. > The ia64 patch is the most complex. The rest are essentially the > same as i386. > > I will email the one remaining patch for -stable (for alpha) to David > directly. Why memset(3) the anon memory to zero, isn't that what it's supposed to be initialized to anyway? -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message