Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:23:18 +0900 From: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> To: freebsd-vuxml@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vuln.xml *is* XML (was Re: vuln.xml is not XML) Message-ID: <7mk6vg2m15.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <CDBCA21A-FAE2-11D8-A99F-000A95BC6FAE@celabo.org> References: <20040830133416.X35009@xeon.unixathome.org> <CDBCA21A-FAE2-11D8-A99F-000A95BC6FAE@celabo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:15:02 -0500, Jacques Vidrine wrote: > > I refer to my previous message regarding the difficulties in parsing > > vuln.xml. I have since learned that any markup (e.g. <p>) should be > > be in > > a CDATA section. > > > > See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/ and look at section 2.7. > > > > CDATA sections begin with the string "<![CDATA[" and end with the > > string "]]>":] > > > > I propose that markup be enclosed with a CDATA section. > > No this is absolutely wrong :-) The XHTML is embedded with VuXML... > the whole document is one XML document. Some elements are in the VuXML > namespace, while others are in the XHTML namespace. Markup cannot > exist in a CDATA section--- if it is in a CDATA section, it is *not* > markup but *text content*. Both are correct. In good old XML world, we should use CDATA section to quote external markup. On the other hand, VuXML lives in XML + Namespace world (see related recommendations). > I saw your earlier message about XML::Node, but since I am not familiar > with that (or XML::Parser), I did not understand what problem you were > having. Could you try to describe it differently? I'm not sure XML::Parser can handle namespace correctly. If it cannot do such, parser will confuse when it reads markups with namespace. -- Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc. <kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7mk6vg2m15.wl>