From owner-freebsd-arch  Wed Jan 17  3:38:58 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from freebsd.dk (freebsd.dk [212.242.42.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 038F637B400; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 03:38:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from sos@localhost)
	by freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.1) id MAA11834;
	Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:38:33 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from sos)
From: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>
Message-Id: <200101171138.MAA11834@freebsd.dk>
Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: await/asleep removal imminent
In-Reply-To: <20010117031618.K7240@fw.wintelcom.net> from Alfred Perlstein at "Jan 17, 2001 03:16:19 am"
To: bright@wintelcom.net (Alfred Perlstein)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:38:33 +0100 (CET)
Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

It seems Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Please trim cc's as appropriate.
> 
> I have a patch here that removes await/asleep from the kernel API.
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/noasleep.diff
> 
> Matt Dillon implemented alseep/await quite some time ago and the
> only thing that's using it is ata.  In order to clean up some of
> the schduler and vm system I'm removing support for it.
> 
> Peter Wemm and I suspect that ata doesn't need it.  Right now I'm
> running several make -j128 buildworlds and buildkernels with this
> patch to catch any ata problems.

I'll commit the ata part as soon as I have it tested here....

-Søren


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message