From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Nov 22 16:18:54 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA29188 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 16:18:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from main.gbdata.com ([207.90.222.20]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA29179 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 16:18:43 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gclarkii@localhost) by main.gbdata.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) id SAA06854; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 18:16:55 -0600 (CST) From: Gary Clark II Message-Id: <199611230016.SAA06854@main.gbdata.com> Subject: Re: Keeping users from bind'ing to ports To: langfod@dihelix.com (David Langford) Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 18:16:53 -0600 (CST) Cc: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199611221930.JAA01080@localhost.my.domain> from David Langford at "Nov 22, 96 09:30:24 am" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk David Langford wrote: > > Is there a way of keeping some users from being able to run programs > that bind to ports over 1024? (i.e. to keep users from running servers) I don't know any of doing ths except maybe with IP firewall. Anyone else? > > Ideally this would involve a user file like crontab uses to allow > known users to use the ports. > > > Thanks, > -David Langford > langfod@dihelix.com > > Gary -- Gary Clark II (N5VMF) | I speak only for myself and "maybe" my company gclarkii@GBData.COM | Member of the FreeBSD Doc Team Providing Internet and ISP startups mail info@GBData.COM for information FreeBSD FAQ at ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.ORG/pub/FreeBSD/docs/freebsd-faq.ascii