From owner-cvs-all Tue Sep 21 11:32:59 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from gratis.grondar.za (gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29CB14DB5; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 11:32:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA73900; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 20:32:29 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <199909211832.UAA73900@gratis.grondar.za> To: Dmitrij Tejblum Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, dima@tejblum.pp.ru Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/lib/libcrypt Makefile src/lib/libcrypt Makefile Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 20:32:28 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > Don't you observe MAINTAINER= ?? > > I am following my common sense. Even if you are 'MAINTAINER', you could > to not create problems for other people. You know, you could have asked. You could even have presented a decent technical opinion on this point. Committing on top of my commit (where there is no _breakage_ like Peter fixed) is OUT. > Just FYI, I consider your bump of version number a bit offensive to myself. And if I don't share your opinion? MAINTAINER= is supposed to be a deciding factor here. "Offensive" is a strong word; careful not to let the argument break too many technical boundaries. Please don't do ANY more committing in this area unles there is a solid technical reason, AND you have discussed it with me. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message