Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:10:33 +0300 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@freebsd.org.ru> To: Igor Pokrovsky <igor.pokrovsky@cnrm.meteo.fr> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems with getting through firewall using CVSup Message-ID: <20030228151033.GE424@freebsd.org.ru> In-Reply-To: <3E5F77B4.4392E9FD@cnrm.meteo.fr> References: <200302281442.h1SEg0RV042490@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <3E5F77B4.4392E9FD@cnrm.meteo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:52:36PM +0100, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > Sergey Osokin wrote: > > > > > > Is there any way to make it work? > > > > To fool firewall? > > > > > > Yes, looks like a bad/fool/stupid firewall administriva. > > > > I know, there are lots of companies that permit any inside > > initiated TCP connection. I'd call this stupid if not > > explicitly decided upon and documented. > Yes. I agree, maybe this is a good policy. And moreover > I think that they closed port 5999 on firewall because > of my activities :-) Perhaps they thought that I'm trying > do something, which will break their security. Maybe because > port number is not very popular :-) > > > And last - maybe they are running a strict application level > > gateway like Gauntlet or Sidewinder? If this is the case the > > admin must define a custom TCP proxy for CVSup, first. > No. Fortunatly. Last idea is use CTM. AFAIK your system administrator think that 25 port is much more popular for you and other users :-) -- Rgdz, /"\ ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN Sergey Osokin aka oZZ, \ / AGAINST HTML MAIL http://ozz.pp.ru/ X AND NEWS / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030228151033.GE424>