Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Jul 2000 07:44:48 +0530
From:      Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Cc:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com>, Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>, Dann Lunsford <dann@greycat.com>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: No port of Opera? (Was: ((FreeBSD : Linux) :: (OS/2 : Windows)))
Message-ID:  <20000707074448.A4511@physics.iisc.ernet.in>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20000706193313.04a8ca40@localhost>; from brett@lariat.org on Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 08:11:00PM -0600
References:  <Your <4.3.2.7.2.20000706103005.00e05660@localhost> <53082.962927902@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20000706193313.04a8ca40@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have a better idea.  Let's all use opensource software.  No need for
emulation then.

Well, it works for me anyway.

Brett Glass said on Jul  6, 2000 at 20:11:00:
> At 05:58 PM 7/6/2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> 
> >Read my lips: Nobody is ever going to remove the linux compatability
> >code, it's too damn useful, end of discussion.
> 
> It *is* useful, Jordan. It's useful to ensure that FreeBSD doesn't get
> native ports of applications. It's useful to maintain FreeBSD in its
> position of playing second fiddle to Linux forever. And it's useful to 
> limit BSDi's profit potential and the extent of any rewards you 
> personally are likely to reap -- ever -- from your many years of hard 
> work on FreeBSD. 
> 
> I do NOT want to continue this thread for 300 messages, but fortunately,
> there's no need to. It can all be said in a few short paragraphs.
> 
> Jordan, by putting out an OS which emulates a stronger competitor,
> while at the same time NOT providing FreeBSD API compatibility for
> other OSes, you're making two strategic errors that will sabotage 
> not only your life's work so far but your own prospects for being 
> justly and fairly compensated, and duly recognized, for what you do.
> That's not fair to you or to FreeBSD.
> 
> >Not that I expect our very own Don Quixote and his donkey to resist
> >tilting at this particular windmill again, at least not without firing
> >at least a few shots at us for "our unbelievable short-sightedness"
> >(or some such variant on the above), but I suppose I can dream.
> 
> You *are* dreaming, Jordan, but not in the way you think. YOU are
> the Quixotic one, not I, and you're dreaming in the same way Don 
> Quixote does in the well-known musical "Man of La Mancha:"
> 
> To dream the impossible dream;
> To fight the unbeatable foe;
> To bear with unbearable sorrow;
> To run where the brave dare not go.... (etc)
> 
> Don Quixote is so immersed in his books that he loses touch with reality 
> -- to the extent that he doesn't even snap out of it when he tilts at 
> windmills until they beat him senseless.
> 
> It really hurts to see this happen to you, especially when the beating in
> this case is coming at the hands of one Richard Stallman, a nasty demagogue
> if there ever was one.
> 
> This is reality, Jordan. Linux emulation has gotten FreeBSD into serious
> trouble vis a vis third party application support -- the lifeblood of any
> operating environment. Only by taking correct and decisive action can it 
> recover from that damage. I'm not proposing that Linux emulation be cut off 
> instantly (since, as you say, it cannot and will not be) but rather that an 
> exit strategy be devised for it -- at the end of which emulation will be
> neither desired nor needed by anyone.
> 
> The only exit from the emulation trap (as I've already mentioned) involves 
> turning the tables and executing the same "middleware" play that Microsoft 
> so feared when it was executed by Sun and Netscape. Richard Stallman and the 
> FSF are every bit as predatory and desirous of an all-encompassing empire 
> as is Bill Gates, and only the same techniques that threatened to keep 
> Microsoft in check will work to counter Linux's utter dominance in the 
> sphere were FreeBSD should be thriving. Capisch?
> 
> --Brett Glass
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000707074448.A4511>