Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:33:14 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> Cc: i386@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 Message-ID: <20060816113314.8l1kbts740ss4wc4@netchild.homeip.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> (from Wed, 16 Aug =20 2006 10:11:12 +0200): > www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xdivac02/fix.patch > > this fixes it, sorry about it This uipc_sem.c file is build as part of the module build. I don't =20 have the module excluded from my kernel builds, but it didn't break =20 when I compiled a kernel with the changes. Are different warn/error =20 flags for gcc active when building modules? I don't expect this and =20 I'm surprised my build went fine after seeing this error. I also don't =20 see ifdefs around those parts of the code, which may affect the build. >> [...] >> /src/sys/kern/uipc_sem.c: At top level: >> /src/sys/kern/uipc_sem.c:930: error: conflicting types for 'sem_exechook' >> /src/sys/kern/uipc_sem.c:74: error: previous declaration of =20 >> 'sem_exechook' was here Bye, Alexander. --=20 Just remember: when you go to court, you are trusting your fate to twelve people that weren't smart enough to get out of jury duty! http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060816113314.8l1kbts740ss4wc4>