From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 31 20:52:19 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA23221 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 20:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA23216 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 20:52:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebie.lemis.com (gregl1.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.133]) by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA02713; Fri, 1 Aug 1997 13:22:02 +0930 (CST) From: Greg Lehey Received: (grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.8.6/8.6.12) id NAA08506; Fri, 1 Aug 1997 13:22:01 +0930 (CST) Message-Id: <199708010352.NAA08506@freebie.lemis.com> Subject: Re: date(1) In-Reply-To: <199708010349.NAA02681@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from Michael Smith at "Aug 1, 97 01:19:54 pm" To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 1997 13:22:00 +0930 (CST) Cc: brian@awfulhak.org, grog@lemis.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Organisation: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8250 Fax: +61-8-8388-8250 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Michael Smith writes: > Brian Somers stands accused of saying: >>> .....] >>>> The first is just wrong, and the second is a mis-quote. I originally >>>> said: >>>> >>>>> More like: >>>>> >>>>>>> cc[yy[mm[dd[hh]]]]]mm[.ss]] >> >> Arrrghhhhhh ! Your mailer is gobbling the "open square brace" >> characters ! That is *NOT* what I posted. There are two opening >> brackets prior to the ``cc'' that something's eating. > > Greg is almost certainly using supercite inside emacs. Bad boy! No. Real Hackers write their own Emacs macros. And they don't always work right. >> I'm sure we can all agree that this means the above usage (with the >> two wandering brackets included) is correct ? > > Yes. Oh. Think-again-ing you what Grog