Date: 23 Feb 2000 17:21:35 -0800 From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, imura@FreeBSD.ORG, se@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Qt/KDE upgrade path Message-ID: <vqcr9e39yzk.fsf@bubble.didi.com> In-Reply-To: Will Andrews's message of "Wed, 23 Feb 2000 16:09:49 -0500" References: <20000220201511.L44834@shadow.blackdawn.com> <vqc66vj2gar.fsf@bubble.didi.com> <20000221020812.P44834@shadow.blackdawn.com> <200002232043.MAA23197@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000223160949.B33415@shadow.blackdawn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> * I already did the work to bump their shlib versions. You should read * about my work on my Qt/KDE site. :-) Sorry. I did take a look at it a while ago, but I thought you were going to send-pr them. * Only the Qt and KDE libraries need shlib bumps. Ok. Qt is already bumped (in qt145). I looked at the others, there appear to be many gratuitous changes (like reformatting CONFIGURE_ENV) it's hard to tell where's the meat. Other than bumping kdecore's shlib version in LIB_DEPENDS, what is needed urgently (i.e., for the upcoming 4.0R)? * The thing is, we'd need to patch many of the Qt/KDE-based ports to * ensure they work with USE_NEWGCC (temporarily breaking them on -stable) * before we upgrade the shlibs. Or else about 60 ports will be broken on * -stable. Well, I guess they'll get broken either way. :)) We can fix those after the release. I don't want to ship 4.0R with old Qt libs. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqcr9e39yzk.fsf>