From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 23:41:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117631065672 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:41:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bluethundr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4598FC18 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so73605bwz.13 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:41:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=C9mdx0nNsc3/odtcMNRcZV1kUwPd4yAIlk59Ixmmg34=; b=u49a6FgdeZkvNgtCENlHev017Hi/5RR0D+UG9uvlX5AEzTlp57OxNPABaVkaUemicz egfFxfenQhqmWnPQaGytwXKQYAh/xqD5xifbxMCKyaWt3o7bW4dAXhG19SuikzPz+5mn lONZnf0MPoSo0hamwj9Vu2wiqQHFoBF4/Nlwk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AB2Afi5+ETia4OFvofyVEY0zFWOFXwg9xl/3zt4osOJjgp0kWwqK0VA7CksqY+ElYD nEFjHua1adsNORz7vhWxDPHnts7xvgufms/XWlPNW1rdsMqzRlvgRBPqGNdj1UGfFjTK +ZYS6Jt3/nlxvrmeibfCF13ApdCH9zHcpTmcA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.62.136 with SMTP id x8mr7194045bkh.192.1289346098220; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:41:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.81.153 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 15:41:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1065_1289336761_4CD9B7B9_1065_274_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8C11@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> References: <20407_1289335707_4CD9B39B_20407_70_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8C0F@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <1065_1289336761_4CD9B7B9_1065_274_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8C11@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 18:41:38 -0500 Message-ID: From: bluethundr To: Gary Gatten Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Nathan Vidican , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Leonardo Santagostini Subject: Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:41:41 -0000 This might be worth looking into as well! It's an open source load balancer that was originally developed by yahoo and released into the open source community. It is now a part of the Apache project: http://trafficserver.apache.org/ On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Gary Gatten wrote: > If three different providers, then to my knowledge you are SOL - mlppp is= not an option - unless someone here knows something I don't - which is 100= % likely :) > > Now, that said you can configure your routing to split the traffic amongs= t different connections - so traffic to/from certain hosts use connection A= , other hosts use B, etc. =A0You can even get fancy and route based on appl= ication and host if you wish. =A0Ci$co calls this Policy Based Routing. =A0= I'm not sure if FBSD or another package such as pf allows similar functiona= lity. =A0My guess would be yes - but I don't know anything about that. > > As for "bonding" or aggregating your connections to appear as a single on= e - not an option AFAIK. > > G > > ________________________________ > From: Leonardo Santagostini [mailto:lsantagostini@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 2:52 PM > To: Gary Gatten > Cc: Chuck Swiger; Nathan Vidican; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question > > Hello all, > > Im using 3 different providers all from Argentina, Clora, Movistar and Pe= rsonal. > > Thank you > Leonardo Santagostini > > 2010/11/9 Gary Gatten > > > > Also, may be obvious to point out, but all (3) connections "must" be from= the same provider. =A0In the lab you could MAYBE get a stable/usable conne= ction from multiple providers (with just ppp or 'x' encap) by splitting the= requests on the egress side - but it's highly unlikely in the real world. = =A0In most cases the traffic load is asymmetrical and heavily biased toward= s ingress traffic, so even if you could get it to "work" - it wouldn't prov= ide much benefit. > > Just curious, what provider are you using? > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient > =A0and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. > =A0If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > =A0any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email > =A0and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. =A0If you have > =A0received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by > =A0return email and delete this email from your system." > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > --=20 Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5A4873A9 Share and enjoy!!