From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 21:07:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A5C106564A for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:07:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4EE8FC12 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:07:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E45FB93E; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:07:45 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: David Wolfskill Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:46:58 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p10; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <20120330131833.GV1709@albert.catwhisker.org> <201203301218.58451.jhb@freebsd.org> <20120330164112.GY1709@albert.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <20120330164112.GY1709@albert.catwhisker.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201203301346.58219.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:07:45 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Failure to rebuild x11/nvidia-driver on head at r233697 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:07:46 -0000 On Friday, March 30, 2012 12:41:12 pm David Wolfskill wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:18:58PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > ... > > I've sent an e-mail to the NVIDIA driver author about how best to fix this. > > You can just change the driver to use VM_MEMATTR_UNCACHEABLE instead of > > VM_MEMATTR_UNCACHED for now. > > .... > > Thanks; I'd need to make it conditional on something relevant, as I'm > also building under stable/8 & stable/9. You can actually use that on 8 and 9 as well. I think it's a likely a bug that it used VM_MEMATTR_UNCACHED in the first place and that it should have been using VM_MEMATTR_UNCACHEABLE all along. (Which is why I've renamed the obscure and not really useful VM_MEMATTR_UNCACHED.) > My next scheduled build isn't for another 16 hours or so, so I'll sit > tight for now, and take evasive action as necessary. Of course, if > danfe@ wants a tester, I'm certainly game. :-} > > (Besides, I'm actively using the machine, you see.... :-}) > > Peace, > david > -- > David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org > Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. > > See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. > -- John Baldwin