Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 12:36:01 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Robert Withrow <bwithrow@BayNetworks.COM> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Minor problems with upcomming 2.2.5 Message-ID: <199709221836.MAA01760@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199709221830.OAA21976@tuva.engeast.baynetworks.com> References: <199709190520.XAA16476@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199709221830.OAA21976@tuva.engeast.baynetworks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Withrow writes: > > nate@mt.sri.com said: > :- Actually, I think having more process slots is *a good thing* > :- nowadays. Even on my (now ailing) lowly single-user 486/66 box with > :- 16MB, I bump up maxusers. > > How many more? If you suggest a number I could try it and see > if it fixes my problem, and then we'd at least have a datapoint > in the argument for raising the number in GENERIC... I don't have the box handy (the disk is dying on it, and it's at home), but you could try 16 to see if it helps. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709221836.MAA01760>