From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 10 18:05:40 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F401065687
	for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:05:40 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63B78FC0A
	for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:05:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m9AHkoej086776
	for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:46:50 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:46:50 +0400 (MSD)
From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
To: stable@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0810102145010.75240@woozle.rinet.ru>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet
X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1
	(woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:46:50 +0400 (MSD)
Cc: 
Subject: lockd requires statd - is it intentional?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:05:40 -0000

Hi there colleagues,

RELENG_7.

I found that rpc.lockd can't be started without rpc.statd - it reports

Can't start NLM - unable to contact NSM

Is this intentional?  If so, I suppose appropriate magic should be implemented 
in /etc/rc.d/lockd (like rpcbind dependency)


Sincerely,
D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
[ FreeBSD committer:                                 marck@FreeBSD.org ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------