Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:00:38 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bernhard_Fr=F6hlich?= <decke@FreeBSD.org> To: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9.1 AMD64 multitasking efficiency low Message-ID: <CAE-m3X0OpWxvxUv1tBYQu-XBDNw%2BD9UMej3p8niNJicUN8U2_w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFYkXjm9Oa4T_7a=o2rkogj7CYfOPHbx6EjyucBp6phvB5WrPA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFYkXjkACs=2RaCb_BaoNT6PM%2B5gkQSGoKP5G4bR_284v_Eoig@mail.gmail.com> <CAE-m3X3KvNsb7AbQ_yRXEmyisFZ44Qdp4_xFv7HcJ%2BqjgJ0tQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFYkXjm9Oa4T_7a=o2rkogj7CYfOPHbx6EjyucBp6phvB5WrPA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:48 PM, CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Bernhard Fr=F6hlich <decke@freebsd.org> = wrote: >> You can try to switch to emulators/virtualbox-ose-legacy which is >> VirtualBox 4.1.x >> just to rule out that this is a vbox regression. Just be sure to power >> down the VMs >> first. >> It would be interesting to watch if the machine starts to swap when that= is all >> running. > > Hello Bernhard, thank you for your hints, I can try with VBox 4.1, but > first I will try to get rid of the Ext2 from my system. On another > machine I have switched to UFS2 and the speed increased noticably. I > will let you know when I transfer all of those GB of data :-) > > Yes it looks like the cause of the hangup is the swap rush/deadlock > but I could not verify it as the machine was unresponsive. Still both > machines use 1GB of RAM per VM so still 2GB should be free. With other > applications running and the OS taking 1GB itself (what I have seen on > some other posts) this may happen :-( VBox itself also needs some RAM and the emulated Graphics Card which can easily be 128M per VM. --=20 Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAE-m3X0OpWxvxUv1tBYQu-XBDNw%2BD9UMej3p8niNJicUN8U2_w>