Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Aug 2005 09:30:29 +0930
From:      "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
To:        Niki Denev <nike_d@cytexbg.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: if_ipw problems
Message-ID:  <200508040930.40881.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <42F154F1.8080903@cytexbg.com>
References:  <200508022252.33933.nike_d@cytexbg.com> <200508040856.35982.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <42F154F1.8080903@cytexbg.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2400906.t0U6appQb0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 04 August 2005 09:06, Niki Denev wrote:
> > Hmm, I've had my ipw card talk unecrypted and the WEP (128 bit) to a
> > Linksys WRT54G without any problems, although I didn't run it for very
> > long.
>
> Can you test a cvsup ot /usr/src? I get "Network TreeComp failed" (or
> similar) error every time i try this. (tested on 3 different APs).
> This is with ipw + wep, never tested nonencrypted connection.

I have a 5 day old 6.0 kernel I can try tonight if I get the chance (the AP=
 is=20
at home, not work).

You are running cvsup to get that error?
Tried, say, ttcp to do a bandwidth test?

=2D-=20
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C

--nextPart2400906.t0U6appQb0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBC8Vqo5ZPcIHs/zowRAnyjAJ0YIGAaU2nlKXX4qhhLhm0qAvyLGACfesMg
BdPae0NSbVMTsxv5B9SDQFQ=
=pM5o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2400906.t0U6appQb0--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200508040930.40881.doconnor>