Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:44:24 -0600 (CST)
From:      Wes Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org>
To:        =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Can FreeBSD benefit from MacOS X ZFS?
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.1.00.0801161743070.17832@ibyngvyr.purzvxnyf.bet>
In-Reply-To: <86sl0xibpz.fsf@ds4.des.no>
References:  <alpine.BSF.1.00.0801141829370.10868@ibyngvyr.purzvxnyf.bet> <86sl0xibpz.fsf@ds4.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--2180312168-1360128517-1200527065=:17832
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:

> Wes Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org> writes:
>> As the subject says... Can FreeBSD benefit from the macos port of zfs?
>> I know this is a VERY new announcement, but not knowing much about
>> macos x in general I'm wondering how much it might help our tree, with
>> respect to both the memory and 32-bit issues. Just throwing it out
>> there for discussion, if anyone has any knowledge of both.
>
> Did you miss the part where Apple no longer sell 32-bit computers?

Possibly! I looked briefly but didn't see anything explicitly saying that 
later versions of OS X were 64-bit only. But, that's only half of the 
question. There are still memory issues on amd64.

--2180312168-1360128517-1200527065=:17832--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.1.00.0801161743070.17832>