Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 19:09:20 -0600 (CST) From: Anthony Kimball <alk@pobox.com> To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SKIP on 3.1 Message-ID: <14065.41601.661191.482612@avalon.east> References: <199903182204.OAA94934@bubba.whistle.com> <36F18016.5BA99C21@utcorp.com> <19990319001124.A6669@keltia.freenix.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoth Ollivier Robert on Fri, 19 March: : According to Kurt Seel: : > The only caveat for is that I can't talk to the far 10.x net from one of : > the routers :-( : : That's why NAT & RFC-1918 address space usage is evil. Why? Have you determined the cause of the failure, and found that the tunnel/NAT were correctly configured, but protocol constraints prevent any configuration from operating nominally? : End-to-end connec- : tivity is not garanteed any more and that breaks a lot of things. When was end-to-end connectivity ever guaranteed? In a blocks-world, perhaps. : I know : people have problem getting addresses but that should push IPv6 more, not : promote hacks such as NAT. I must confess great skepticism regarding v6. It has been all talk for 10 years now. There is so much v4 equipment installed out there that v6 will remain a ghetto for the next decade -- at least. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14065.41601.661191.482612>