From owner-freebsd-net  Mon Oct  2  6:58:50 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from prism.flugsvamp.com (cb58709-a.mdsn1.wi.home.com [24.17.241.9])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CBD37B502
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Mon,  2 Oct 2000 06:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jlemon@localhost)
	by prism.flugsvamp.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e92DwbA14157;
	Mon, 2 Oct 2000 08:58:37 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from jlemon)
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 08:58:37 -0500 (CDT)
From: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>
Message-Id: <200010021358.e92DwbA14157@prism.flugsvamp.com>
To: julian@elischer.org, net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SACK in FreeBSD TCP.
X-Newsgroups: local.mail.freebsd-net
In-Reply-To: <local.mail.freebsd-net/Pine.BSF.4.10.10010020644350.36257-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
Organization: 
Cc: 
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

In article <local.mail.freebsd-net/Pine.BSF.4.10.10010020644350.36257-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> you write:
>Is anyone working on a SACK  (Selective acknowlegement) implementation
>for FreeBSD?

I believe that Jayanth was working on it at one time, you could ask him.


>It would make a huge difference to performance out here at the edge of the
>univertse (Perth, Western Australia)

That's what all the Australians I know claim.  But is there any hard
data to back that up as well?   (E.g.: does Linux perform better out
there?)
--
Jonathan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message