Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 01:44:12 +0900 From: Kenjiro Cho <kjc@csl.sony.co.jp> To: livensw@rc.bel.alcatel.be (Wim Livens) Cc: freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATLQ support for HARP ? Message-ID: <199903171644.BAA05877@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 Mar 1999 14:19:27 %2B0100." <199903171319.OAA28626@btm4fw.rc.bel.alcatel.be>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> If I only have one PVC per logical interface and using ALTQ to limit the bandwidth >> to each logical interface such that the sum is =< than lets say 130 Mbps, I suppose >> there will be no congestion in the atm driver. Do you think this can work ? >> We're building a research testbed to play with ALTQ etc. I'm just using ATM as a >> wire to have these logical interfaces to avoid the hassle of multiple ethernet >> cards and cables. >> Thanks for the help so far, Then, I recommend you to get an ENI card and use the "pvctxctl" command (in the ALTQ release) to enable hardware shaping on each VC. --Kenjiro To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903171644.BAA05877>