Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:46:21 -0500 From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: base gcc and _GLIBCXX_USE_C99 Message-ID: <510BD53D.1070209@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <510BBCAD.3070705@FreeBSD.org> References: <5106953E.2020907@FreeBSD.org> <510BBCAD.3070705@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello; On 02/01/2013 08:01, Andriy Gapon wrote: > [ping] > > on 28/01/2013 17:11 Andriy Gapon said the following: >> Guys, >> >> I wonder why the following is the case for the base gcc. >> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/c++config.h: >> >> /* Define if C99 functions or macros from <wchar.h>, <math.h>, <complex.h>, >> <stdio.h>, and <stdlib.h> can be used or exposed. */ >> /* #undef _GLIBCXX_USE_C99 */ >> >> Because of this undef there is no e.g. std::strtoll(). >> Ditto for other things in stdlib.h. >> > I looked at this very briefly and it looks like it would fix a nasty issue we have been working around in OpenOffice. I suggest to enable it first on a gcc port though (it's tied to a configure flag, but don't remember which). Pedro.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?510BD53D.1070209>