Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Oct 1997 02:04:15 -0500 (CDT)
From:      "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@futuresouth.com>
To:        Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Cc:        parrothd@midwest.net, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: tty-level buffer overflows
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.971015015805.27275J-100000@shell.futuresouth.com>
In-Reply-To: <19971015145606.47003@lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 15 Oct 1997, Greg Lehey wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 15, 1997 at 12:19:14AM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> >
> > I had a problem with overflows.
> > I have a 28.8 modem, and if I set the port speed to 115200, I get
> > overflows over-flowing on my xconsole.  But only on incoming packets,
> > which would seem to me to be the opposite of what you'd expect.
> 
> It's certainly what I would expect.  It's impossible to get overflows
> on outgoing packets unless the driver is programmed wrong.
There is that...   I was thinking something weird involving a permutation
of...  nevermind.

> 
> > If I set it to 28800, no problems.  If I set it to 14400, no
> > problems.  I know it's not my system that's slow; Cyrix 6x86 166, 72
> > megs RAM, the serial ports are both 16550.
> 
> What happens if you set the port speed to 57600?  If that works, that
> should be enough for you.  Otherwise you should check your cabling and
> modem setup.  You should be using hardware handshake.  Check this
> excerpt from "The Complete FreeBSD":
<snip>
> 
> If you look at this profile, you'll notice that the active profile includes the
> parameter &K4.   This  means  ``use  XON/XOFF  flow  control''.   This  is  not
> desirable: it's better to use RTS/CTS flow control.  To fix it,
> 
OK; maybe I did use bad phrasing...
Both serial ports REPORT 16550.  cuaa1 is an internal 28.8 modem.  I can't
look at my modem's settings now, obviously, since I'm PPP'd into my ISP,
but when I do this:
PPP ON mortis> show modem
device: /dev/cuaa1 speed:28800
cs8, no parity, CTS/RTS on.
(blah blah blah)
doesn't that mean that it is enabled at all levels?

I don't think this is a big problem either way; my ISA bus isn't exactly
overflowing, so I don't think I gain much speed or reliability my having
compression to my modem, but I'm not too knowledgeable about bus issues
anyway, so...

Thoughts, anyone?

*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
|       FreeBSD; the way computers were meant to be       |
* "The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is *
| that I haven't figured out how to light the middle yet."|
*    fullermd@futuresouth.com      :-}  MAtthew Fuller    *
|      http://keystone.westminster.edu/~fullermd          |
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971015015805.27275J-100000>