From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 24 19:17:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688CB16A4A9; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:17:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D276C43D60; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:17:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from doc.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FuDdQ-000FNx-JU; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 23:17:36 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FuDeS-000EFp-R9; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 23:18:40 +0400 To: Eric Anholt References: <200606231317.21964@aldan> <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> <95716261@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <1151091773.7299.2.camel@vonnegut> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 23:18:40 +0400 In-Reply-To: <1151091773.7299.2.camel@vonnegut> (Eric Anholt's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:42:53 -0700") Message-ID: <15386511@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:17:45 -0000 On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:42:53 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote: > On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 22:07 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:28:39 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote: > > > > > You're getting software rendering with linux_dri. LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose > > > is the way to debug DRI issues, but I can shortcut here and yes, the > > > absence of i915_dri.so is the problem. We need to get linux_dri updated > > > to a set of recent Mesa binaries. I wonder what our current > > > > There are some efforts. :-) But no "when" so far. > > > > > linux_base's package of dri modules looks like? > > > > Linux_base doesn't have any X-related stuff. Nore does current linux > > X-port (linux-xorg-libs). We do have only graphics/linux_dri based on > > XFree86-4.4.0. > OK, I checked what FC4 has, and their big xorg RPM is 6.8.2 and contains > DRI drivers. However, I don't think we want to use FC4's, not just > because of the size of the RPM, but also because the drivers are likely > to be too stale. The DRI driver <-> DDX interface breaks backwards > compat much more often than the DRI <-> DRM interface (which in theory > never breaks). So, we really want some fresh Mesa 6.4.2+ DRI drivers, > which we can't get from FC4. > So, that means someone needs to get a linux box with suitable glibc > again and roll their own like I used to, probably. Or maybe steal > binaries from some other distro. Suggestions? The only one candidate I've found so far is Mesa-6.4.2-19.i586.rpm from OpenSuSE: ftp://ftp.chg.ru/.1/Linux/opensuse/distribution/SL-10.1/inst-source/suse/i586/Mesa-6.4.2-19.i586.rpm I'll try to test it soon. Anybody willing may beat me at testing. ;-) WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider