Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 20:57:28 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "J. Goodleaf" <john@goodleaf.net> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make -j4 vs -j8... 4 works, but 8 does not Message-ID: <20010920205728.C66160@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <20010920163247.8064D5C74@clyde.goodleaf.net>; from john@goodleaf.net on Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:32:47PM %2B0000 References: <200109170009.f8H09Y921584@gits.dyndns.org> <20010920153546.8D69937B411@hub.freebsd.org> <20010920163247.8064D5C74@clyde.goodleaf.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:32:47PM +0000, J. Goodleaf wrote: > I'm sorry to interject into this cool benchmark discussion. I have a > non-critical issue relating to this. I have a dual PII 350 machine with 256 > RAM (once badass, now...) Interestingly, make -j4, 6, 8 all return errors > while building the perl libraries. make -j10, however, works flawlessly. I'm > not really alarmed by this, but I am curious. Any ideas? (Sadly, I did not > keep the error log from my last attempt, or I would have attached it.) > If any of -j builds is broken this means that parallel build is broken. This usually indicates the miss of the .ORDER make(1) directives. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010920205728.C66160>