Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:19:59 -0800
From:      Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r218822 - in head: . contrib/binutils contrib/binutils/bfd contrib/binutils/bfd/doc contrib/binutils/bfd/po contrib/binutils/binutils contrib/binutils/binutils/doc contrib/binutils/binu...
Message-ID:  <20110220221959.GA56100@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20110220220940.GP78089@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
References:  <201102182054.p1IKsDMx071986@svn.freebsd.org> <20110220220144.GA56015@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20110220220940.GP78089@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:09:40AM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 02:01:44PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 08:54:13PM +0000, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > > Author: dim
> > > Date: Fri Feb 18 20:54:12 2011
> > > New Revision: 218822
> > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/218822
> > > 
> > > Log:
> > >   Merge binutils 2.17.50 to head.  This brings a number of improvements to
> > >   x86 CPU support, better support for powerpc64, some new directives, and
> > >   many other things.  Bump __FreeBSD_version, and add a note to UPDATING.
> > >   
> > >   Thanks to the many people that have helped to test this.
> > 
> > This commit appears to be causing 
> > 
> > laptop:kargl[205] ~/work/bin/gfortran -o z a.f
> > /usr/bin/ld: error in /usr/home/kargl/work/lib/gcc/i386-unknown-freebsd9.0/4.6.0/crtend.o(.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.
> > 
> > 
> > Unfortunately, one can no longer run the GCC testsuite because
> > the testsuite is not expecting the /usr/bin/ld message.
> > 
> > So, is there an patch that needs to been sent upstream to GCC
> > to fix crtend.o?  Or. can you fix /usr/bin/ld to not emit this
> > seemingly harmless message?
> I suspect this is the same issue as was fixed by r209294 in FreeBSD
> svn repo. Most likely, similar approach would help gcc.

Thanks for the pointer to r209294.  I'll see if I can fix
gcc and submit a patch.

-- 
Steve



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110220221959.GA56100>