Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:16:37 -0500 From: Jeremy Messenger <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com> To: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: optionsng not saving options on some ports Message-ID: <CADLFtteuPEdqM4yYUFG_X3DYC-qrVQuUOkA58cDOLSORmYWgoQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1vNSTBHJO=XFPNkijHa%2BF%2Bjv82cO2B34xAQvxWsy_tj-g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAN6yY1vNSTBHJO=XFPNkijHa%2BF%2Bjv82cO2B34xAQvxWsy_tj-g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> wrote: > Once again I hit a case where a port being upgraded by portmaster asked for > options configuration (dialog4ports) nd fails to either save it correctly > or to find the saved options. > > I ran portmaster to upgrade ruby18-bdb43. I was asked to select options > three times, once for 'make fetch', one for 'make', and once for 'make > install'. Unfortunately, it seems that the options I selected were simply > ignored as I de-selected both DOC and EXAMPLE, but both were built and > installed. > > The same thing happened while ago with another port (libxml2?). I assume > it is something about the way the Makefile is written that is wrong, but it > certainly is annoying and, if it was a port where I REALLY need a certain > option, I'd have a more serious problem. It's known issue. See here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/148637 The PR doesn't display my message very well in HTML, so you will have to click on the 'Raw PR' link in the bottom to read my message better. > -- > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com -- mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLFtteuPEdqM4yYUFG_X3DYC-qrVQuUOkA58cDOLSORmYWgoQ>