From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec 26 03:39:58 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E2B16A41F;
	Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:39:58 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from scottl@samsco.org)
Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E2A43D5E;
	Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:39:57 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from scottl@samsco.org)
Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBQ3dndK096273;
	Sun, 25 Dec 2005 20:39:49 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from scottl@samsco.org)
Message-ID: <43AF660B.1030506@samsco.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 20:39:55 -0700
From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050615
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>
References: <jfvogel@gmail.com>	<2a41acea0512220941y61c9b5acs8053e6df8a96a1e4@mail.gmail.com>	<E1Eph9s-0002F4-8O@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
	<2a41acea0512251114u6cdbb439j3cb6e3ec07f97189@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0512251114u6cdbb439j3cb6e3ec07f97189@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed 
	version=3.1.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org
Cc: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: em bad performance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:39:58 -0000

Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 12/22/05, Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> wrote:
> 
> 
>>iperf -c host
>>
>>i'm begining to believe that the problem is elsewhere, i just put in
>>an ethernet nic in a PCI-X/Express slot, and the performance is similar, bad.
>>
>>danny
> 
> 
> Hmm, not some silly like getting set to half duplex? :)
> 
> Jack

Isn't 'half duplex' meaningless in the gigabit link protocol?

Scott