From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 15 13:32:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95EC106566C for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe11.tele2.se [212.247.155.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EAC68FC12 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=vWjDCZN0tDgA:10 a=gg2W7PyvkLb8p4ie143lBA==:17 a=r7U4exS7A-IL3ncmhQYA:9 a=ktwAaxRaf3aRyZnDewy82YTyWYEA:4 Received: from [194.248.135.20] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop.adsl.tele2.no) by mailfe11.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.13) with ESMTPA id 1107565154; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:32:21 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: Krassimir Slavchev Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:32:02 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA1; KDE/4.2.4; i386; ; ) References: <4A5C3BF5.9030200@bulinfo.net> <200907151353.21403.hselasky@c2i.net> <4A5DD842.3080007@bulinfo.net> In-Reply-To: <4A5DD842.3080007@bulinfo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907151532.03875.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ohci not detected on at91rm9200? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:32:24 -0000 On Wednesday 15 July 2009 15:23:14 Krassimir Slavchev wrote: > Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > >> It is detected but after configuring the interface I cannot send/receive > > > > You need to "ifconfig up" the interface on both sides before any traffic > > will pass. > > Of course they are: > > cdce0: > flags=108c43 > metric 0 mtu 1500 > ether 2a:00:00:00:00:00 > inet 192.168.2.121 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255 > media: Ethernet 10baseT/UTP > status: active > > ate0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=8 > ether 43:00:00:01:ff:00 > inet 192.168.2.189 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active You should have cdce devices on both sides, PC and Host. Looks like there will be a network conflict if you use 192.168.2.xx for both network devices when they are not on the same cable. ? --HPS