Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:34:03 -0700
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@freebsd.org>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r305066 - head/tools/tools/crypto
Message-ID:  <9289003.aPpUzvfJdT@ralph.baldwin.cx>
In-Reply-To: <201608301428.u7UESZKQ005906@repo.freebsd.org>
References:  <201608301428.u7UESZKQ005906@repo.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 02:28:35 PM George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
> Author: gnn
> Date: Tue Aug 30 14:28:35 2016
> New Revision: 305066
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/305066
> 
> Log:
>   Update cryptotest for modern algorithms
>   
>   Reviewed by:	cem
>   Sponsored by:	Rubicon Communications, LLC (Netgate)
>   Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7598

Doesn't removing 'static' result in a bunch of warnings from clang now since
you don't have function prototypes?  Assuming these functions aren't meant
to be exposed as a library to other programs, static is more correct.

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9289003.aPpUzvfJdT>