Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:50:35 GMT From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: threads/94176: KSE: sigwait doesn't recieve SIGWINCH sent by pthread_kill() or kill -WINCH Message-ID: <200604280950.k3S9oZHj036658@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR threads/94176; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: eugeny gladkih <john@drweb.com> Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, David Xu <davidxu@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: threads/94176: KSE: sigwait doesn't recieve SIGWINCH sent by pthread_kill() or kill -WINCH Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:48:23 +0300 on 27/04/2006 19:50 eugeny gladkih said the following: >>>>>> "AG" == Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> writes: [snip] > AG> http://condor.wesleyan.edu/cgi-bin/man.cgi?section=2&topic=sigwait [snip] > why so stupid code should be presented in all software wanted > just to wait the signal? :( Eugeny, I already read your subsequent email, but I still would like to point that the link I gave and what David says explain pretty good the reason why this is needed. > sigwait'ed signal is not ignored one! we DON'T ignore it we DO > wait for it. I'm afraid there is another problem with SIGTERM > which will terminate process. am I right, yeah? > -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200604280950.k3S9oZHj036658>