Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 08:54:47 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de> To: "Charles P. Schaum" <verbo.solo@sbcglobal.net> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PC-BSD and DesktopBSD compared to FreeBSD Message-ID: <450A4E37.6090703@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <1158299373.1608.72.camel@elbereth.gateway.2wire.net> References: <1158299373.1608.72.camel@elbereth.gateway.2wire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Charles P. Schaum wrote: > A note on PC-BSD and DesktopBSD as compared to my -STABLE experiences: > > -STABLE works best. First, PC-BSD will panic under more conditions than > -RELEASE, -STABLE or DesktopBSD. I did some monkeying around and found > that to be true, especially with older boxes. Second, DesktopBSD works > better than PC-BSD, and noticeably so. But it's based on 5 and I want 6. > So that kinda throws a spanner in the works. The DesktopBSD development version is based on 6-Stable. they're waiting for the 6.2 release to release their new release.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?450A4E37.6090703>