From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 27 11:37:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3062CD13 for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 11:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (heidi.turbocat.net [88.198.202.214]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0EAFB20 for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 11:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F19B01FE029; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 13:37:17 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <535CEC27.2030702@selasky.org> Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 13:38:15 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: huanghwh@gmail.com Subject: Re: xhci controller problem on MBPr2013 References: <535CA9FF.4090601@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-usb@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 11:37:20 -0000 On 04/27/14 10:57, Huang Wen Hui wrote: > Hi, > The system hang at random place after pass xhci message. Before hangs, no > usb device > can attach in most time. > Hi, If you change IMOD_DEFAULT like shown below, does it make any difference? > === ./xhcireg.h > ================================================================== > --- ./xhcireg.h (revision 264804) > +++ ./xhcireg.h (local) > @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ > #define XHCI_IMOD_IVAL_SET(x) (((x) & 0xFFFF) << 0) /* 250ns unit */ > #define XHCI_IMOD_ICNT_GET(x) (((x) >> 16) & 0xFFFF) /* 250ns unit */ > #define XHCI_IMOD_ICNT_SET(x) (((x) & 0xFFFF) << 16) /* 250ns unit */ > -#define XHCI_IMOD_DEFAULT 0x000001F4U /* 8000 IRQ/second */ > +#define XHCI_IMOD_DEFAULT 0x01F401F4U /* 8000 IRQ/second */ > #define XHCI_ERSTSZ(n) (0x0028 + (0x20 * (n))) /* XHCI event ring segment table size */ > #define XHCI_ERSTS_GET(x) ((x) & 0xFFFF) > #define XHCI_ERSTS_SET(x) ((x) & 0xFFFF) Second, if you comment out in xhci.c: /* catch any lost interrupts */ xhci_do_poll(&sc->sc_bus); Does that change anything? Try one change at a time. Thank you! --HPS