Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:48:11 +0200 From: fandino <fandino@ng.fadesa.es> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3b7and poor ata performance Message-ID: <417E71BB.1000508@ng.fadesa.es> In-Reply-To: <77F3FD4D-26BE-11D9-9A2F-003065ABFD92@mac.com> References: <14479.1098695558@critter.freebsd.dk> <417D25E8.6080804@ng.fadesa.es> <200410251928.01536.victor@alf.dyndns.ws> <200410251837.58257.Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com> <417D3F12.20302@DeepCore.dk> <417D40A1.9030802@ng.fadesa.es> <417D45F1.9090504@freebsd.org> <77F3FD4D-26BE-11D9-9A2F-003065ABFD92@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Charles Swiger wrote: > On Oct 25, 2004, at 2:29 PM, Scott Long wrote: >> Some cases can give you desirable performance increases as a side effect, >> but that is not the primary goal. For greedy applications like video processing. > Disagree. Why else would you use RAID-0 striping? speed? > [ If you simply want to create a logical volume bigger than the size of > a physical drive, you can use concatenation instead. ] because it doesn't split the load over disks and you get busy disks and idle disks.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?417E71BB.1000508>