Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      25 Oct 1996 13:20:09 +0100
From:      Paul Richards <p.richards@elsevier.co.uk>
To:        "Daniel M. Eischen" <deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Experiences with CDE for FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <57pw27utfq.fsf@tees.elsevier.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: "Daniel M. Eischen"'s message of Thu, 24 Oct 1996 18:45:01 -0500
References:  <9610242345.AA10608@iworks.InterWorks.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
"Daniel M. Eischen" <deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org> writes:

> Other than the above problems, everything else seems to be working
> just fine.  It looks very professional and just like CDE on 
> Solaris 2.5 - even the pretty login window.

Is it as slow :-)

Hmm, actually, really, how's performance, I quite liked CDE but the
Sparc 5 at work was really sluggish but it might just have been that
Solaris couldn't cope with CDE rather than CDE itself. CDE seemed to
have a large memory footprint and I've noticed that Solaris isn't very
happy unless it's got lots of headroom memory wise.

-- 
  Paul Richards. Originative Solutions Ltd.  (Netcraft Ltd. contractor)
  Elsevier Science TIS online journal project.
  Email: p.richards@elsevier.co.uk
  Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 (0)1865 843155



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57pw27utfq.fsf>