Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 01:53:18 +0100 From: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@ftf.net> To: cjclark@home.com Cc: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@ftf.net>, Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Uptime ! (507 days and going) Message-ID: <19991231015318.40151@ns.int.ftf.net> In-Reply-To: <199912310008.TAA91293@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com>; from Crist J. Clark on Thu, Dec 30, 1999 at 07:08:47PM -0500 References: <19991224172048.17894@ns.int.ftf.net> <199912310008.TAA91293@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Crist J. Clark writes: > interrupt total rate > clk0 irq0 1296951033 99 > rtc0 irq8 1660151845 128 > fdc0 irq6 60370 0 > wdc0 irq14 944831167 72 > > Is it potentially harmful for these to go negative or roll over (not > in vmstat(1) output, but the kernel registers it reads)? Maybe They're just counters. Makes statistics more difficult, shouldn't be a problem otherwise... I don't know how this is handled in 3.x and -CURRENT. > vmstat(1) should be using 'unsigned long's rather than 'long's? -- [ In 1 days, 0 hours and 7 minutes, this line might fail Y2K compliance ] y2k -- an occasion to remember how far we haven't come in the last 2000 years. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991231015318.40151>