From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 19 21:16:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9E116A4BF for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 21:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from petasus.ch.intel.com (petasus.ch.intel.com [143.182.124.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F7643FBF for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 21:16:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.202.83]) 21:18:22 rfjohns1 Exp $) with ESMTP id h7K4FBL21924; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 04:15:12 GMT Received: from chlx254.ch.intel.com (chlx254.ch.intel.com [143.182.223.78]) by sedona.intel.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/d:) with ESMTP id h7K4GYkp008785; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 21:16:34 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: from chlx254.ch.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h7K4GZ33009040; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 21:16:35 -0700 Received: (from jreynold@localhost)h7K4GY4j009037; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 21:16:34 -0700 From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16194.63010.693361.890699@chlx254.ch.intel.com> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 21:16:34 -0700 To: "John J. Rushford" In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under Emacs 21.1.1 cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is rl broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 04:16:38 -0000 This thread originally taken from the -stable mailing list, but I'm seeing weird things in -current now, so I thought I'd ask .... > I cvsup'd and rebuilt a FreeBSD 4.8 system last Friday after receiving the > realpath security advisory. The machine is remote and the NIC uses the rl > driver. After booting the machine I had no network connectivity. The > person at the remote site says the boot was normal and he could see that the > NIC was properly configured but he could not ping it and I could not login. > We booted off kernel.old and everything came up fine. > I have a machine with an Intel nic using the fxp driver that is exhibiting the same sort of weirdness. I just installed 5.1-RELEASE on it after it was built and things were rock solid. I got my NIC configured to use DHCP in my LAN here at home, everything's fine. then I cvsup and buildworld/kernel (the same kernel config that an *identical* system on my LAN is using) and test out the new kernel before installkernel and dhclient seems to finish properly and the interface seems configured correctly with the correct IP. netstat -r shows the right stuff, but I can't even ping the NIC itself. It says sendto: permission denied when I try to ping the NIC itself and *also* 127.0.0.1. If I revert back to the 5.1-RELEASE kernel with the same hardware and zero config changes, everything is hunky dory again. Sorry, I'm light on details--I need to do some more experiments and will cut-n-paste what I see, but I wanted to see if anybody else is experiencing anything oddball like this. -Jr -- John Reynolds Sr. Physical Design Engineer - WCCG/CCE PDE Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 RIM PIN: 10326855 jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com (e-mail with "PAGE" in subj to forward to RIM)