From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 3 02:11:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB3B1065672 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:11:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pz-freebsd-ports@ziemba.us) Received: from ziemba.us (208-106-105-148.dsl.static.sonic.net [208.106.105.148]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316628FC14 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:11:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pz-freebsd-ports@ziemba.us) Received: from hairball.ziemba.us (localhost.ziemba.us [127.0.0.1]) by hairball.ziemba.us (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mB32AfAn026816 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:10:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pz-freebsd-ports@ziemba.us) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by hairball.ziemba.us (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id mB32AfQ0026815 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:10:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pz-freebsd-ports@ziemba.us) X-Authentication-Warning: hairball.ziemba.us: mailnull set sender to pz-freebsd-ports@ziemba.us using -f Received: (from news@localhost) by hairball.ziemba.us (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id mB32AesB026751 for treehouse-mail-freebsd-ports@hairball.treehouse.napa.ca.us; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:10:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from news) From: "G. Paul Ziemba" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-id: References: <20081202192410.GA69963@sysmon.tcworks.net> Errors-to: "G. Paul Ziemba" Subject: Re: Proposal: mechanism for local patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: paul+usenet@w6yx.stanford.edu List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:11:15 -0000 lambert@lambertfam.org (Scott Lambert) writes: >How about something like WRKDIRPREFIX? >Presumably the logic for dealing with that structure is already in >the system. Maybe you could have USE_LOCAL_PATCHES boolean which >uses ${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}/files subdirs in WRKDIRPREFIX, or >LOCALPATCHDIRPREFIX if you want to keep your patches in CVS/SVN without >polluting the CVS/SVN working directory. I'm not sure I undersand - do you mean that you'd pick one of $(WRKDIRPREFIX)/${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}/files or $(LOCALPATCHDIRPREFIX)/${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}/files to get patches from, based on the state of USE_LOCAL_PATCHES? But I was hoping to augment $(WRKDIRPREFIX)/${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}/files instead of replacing it. -- G. Paul Ziemba FreeBSD unix: 6:06PM up 2 days, 3:36, 8 users, load averages: 1.55, 1.38, 1.31