From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct  2 06:45:14 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D9E16A4B3
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Oct 2003 06:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from s1.stradamotorsports.com (ip30.gte4.rb1.bel.nwlink.com
	[209.20.215.30])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67A043FD7
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Oct 2003 06:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net)
Received: from s1.stradamotorsports.com (s1.stradamotorsports.com
	[192.168.1.201])h92Dj6HK044425
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 06:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net)
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 06:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@highperformance.net>
X-X-Sender: jcw@s1.stradamotorsports.com
To: chat@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20031001120445.1aaf62c4.nospam@hiltonbsd.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0310020640530.44406-100000@s1.stradamotorsports.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,USER_AGENT_PINE
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Subject: Re: Ack!  SYSTEMTYPE=WIN32
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
	<freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 13:45:14 -0000

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Stephen Hilton wrote:

> Jason,
>
> Seems like I fell for this at some point or another :)
>
> Do you actually use kerberised telnet with ROT_13 as the
> encryption for the telnet session after authentication ?
>
> Is such a combination possible (not in theory :)

I don't know that MIT Kerberos has such an encryption type.  It does have
encryption types that it warns against using.  No.  I do not use ROT_13 to
encrypt my telnet sessions.

Congratulations to Dag-Erling who's powers of observation snuffed me out.
I never expected anyone to bite on my little ruse, but once someone did I
decided it was OK to have a little fun with it by playing dumb.

Later,
Jason