From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Jan 23 08:50:06 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA28790
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 08:50:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from norse.mcc.ac.uk (pp@norse.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.22])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA28750
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 08:49:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from albatross.mcc.ac.uk by norse.mcc.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 23 Jan 1997 16:34:41 +0000
Received: (from ip@localhost) by albatross.mcc.ac.uk (8.8.4/8.6.12) id QAA00609;
          Thu, 23 Jan 1997 16:34:50 GMT
From: Ian Pallfreeman <ip@mcc.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <199701231634.QAA00609@albatross.mcc.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: newer sound stuff?
To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 16:34:50 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.94.970122224649.15372T-100000@localhost> from "Doug White" at Jan 22, 97 10:48:16 pm
Reply-To: ip@mcc.ac.uk
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 22 Jan 1997, Doug White wrote:

> Considering that the guspnp6 patchkit is built for 2.2-ALPHA/BETA, I'm
> surprised it even compiled on current.

There ain't _that_ much difference... I'd've been surprised if it didn't. 

My point, though: Why is the 2.2/3.0 sound code so old? 

I'm supping -CURRENT since it seems like "a good thing to do", and I'd rather
like an up-to-date version of the sound driver in there. Is this terribly 
unrealistic?

Ian.